February 15th, 2010
November 17th, 2009
Yes, I’m alive.
Since the second half of last summer I’ve been inactive in the Free Software arena. No commits, no emails from me in the last few months which may indicate that the projects are dead. So I wanted to write to let you know that I have no plans to stop maintaining any of my projects. I will start to catch up with all the things I’ve missed in the projects I normally contribute to and the projects I develop alone.
The reason why you’d heard nothing from me is that I left Spain to move to Oxford, in order to work at the cool company behind 2degreesnetwork.com. The removal was the most time-consuming and stressful thing I’d ever done, but after one month working here, I’m happy to say that it was worth it. The atmosphere is just like I thought Web 2.0 companies were, and I am surrounded by nice and talented people. I can’t be happier.
Well, back to the projects, I had to wait a lot to get access to the Internet at home, but I got it a couple of weeks ago and have been catching up (slowly) with the pending stuff. I still have a huge stack of unanswered emails, for example.
For the last couple of weeks I was working fulltime on repoze.what 1.1 and repoze.what-django. I hope to finish the documentation and get the first alpha releases out very soon; the code itself is pretty much ready and, as usual, fully tested. I didn’t have plans to do a repoze.what 1.1 release anytime soon, but while developing repoze.what-django I found myself implementing something which would be useful outside Django (i.e., ACLs) and thus I decided to move it to repoze.what.
After that, I want to improve the auth documentation in TurboGears 2. repoze.what-pylons is the crucial part of the repoze.what integration in TG2 and it’s fully documented, but duplicating part of those docs won’t do any harm and adding some tips and tricks would be nice. I started doing that some months ago but never committed it; I have to finish it this time.
Then I’d like to make repoze.what-pylons take advantage of the new features in repoze.what 1.1, like repoze.what-django already does.
July 29th, 2009
I recently had to implement a recommender system for the Netflix Prize. Out of the best known models, I chose Yehuda Koren’s SVD++ model as published on the paper entitled “Factorization Meets the Neighborhood: a Multifaceted Collaborative Filtering Model” (the version that doesn’t take into account temporal effects; I’d have implemented the complete model, but couldn’t due to time constraints).
It’s the first project, as far as I know, that uses Booleano. With it, you can get random movie recommendations and filter them, like this:
# Get 5 movie recommendations for user #7, at least those published after 2001
wooflix recommendations 7 --max="5" --filter="movie:year > 2001"
Keep in mind that I won’t offer support for it; I’m publishing because I thought it might be useful for some people, but I have no intentions to work on it in the future.
July 17th, 2009
I am proud to announce the first alpha release of Booleano, a Python-based interpreter of boolean expressions:
Booleano is an interpreter of boolean expressions, a library to define and run filters available as text (e.g., in a natural language) or in Python code.
In order to handle text-based filters, Booleano ships with a fully-featured parser whose grammar is adaptive: Its properties can be overridden using simple configuration directives.
On the other hand, the library exposes a pythonic API for filters written in pure Python. These filters are particularly useful to build reusable conditions from objects provided by a third party library.
It’s been designed to address the following use cases:
- Convert text-based conditions: When you need to turn a condition available as plain text into something else (i.e., another filter).
- Evaluate text-based conditions: When you have a condition available as plain text and need to iterate over items in order to filter out those for which the evaluation of the condition is not successful.
- Evaluate Python-based conditions: When you have a condition represented by a Python object (nothing to be parsed) and need to iterate over items in order to filter out those for which the evaluation of the condition is not successful.
It is a project I found necessary while working on repoze.what 2, which I’ve been developing for the last few months in my spare time. This release is absolutely usable, but lacks documentation because I needed this release out for a (small) project I need to work on ASAP (it will depend on Booleano). The next release will ship with a nice documentation, I promise.
June 17th, 2009
My new key is EFFAB77E092DD1E2 and you can download it from keyservers such as hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com or hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net. This new key has been signed with my old keys, to help you decide if you could trust it.
June 15th, 2009
My VPS provider was cracked last week by an attacker who removed everything on the host machines (yes, the frightening “rm -rf /”!), so my sites (including what.repoze.org) had been down until yesterday night.
The attack was performed on Sunday, but I had to wait until Friday to get a new server (fortunately I don’t host anything sensitive here). Then I spent two more days setting up the new server from scratch (not that it was too complex, but I didn’t have much time to do it). That’s why it took so much time for the sites to be back.
April 16th, 2009
My laptop was slow while running my chain and ball KDE 4, and also got some things broken recently (e.g., battery, screen hinges), so I decided to buy a new one last week before it leaves me stranded. And soon enough I realized that I had two options:
- Buy it in a place where every single computer ships with Windows, so that I could claim a refund. I didn’t care about the money: I just wanted to mess with that kind of vendors and file a lawsuit if I didn’t get it on good terms, to encourage people to do the same thing and thus contribute to do away with the Windows Tax.
- Purchase it from a Linux pre-installed vendor, to support them. Even if they pre-installed a freedom-trampling system like Windows, it’d be good to show them that Freedomware worths it.
I liked both options alike, so I based my decision on the computer specs and costs, not on the vendor/manufacturer.
I decided to get a Dell XPS M1330, one of the two Ubuntu-powered computers that I remembered Dell sells in Spain. So I visited dell.es/ubuntu and was surprised to find just a couple of netbooks! Change of plans; now I’ll have to get it with Windows and claim a refund, I told myself.
So the first step was to get a proof that I was imposed the operating system when I bought the laptop. Sales representatives were available for a chat, so I asked them how could I get a Dell XPS M1330 without Windows. The surprising answer was that it was available with Ubuntu and pointed me to configure2.euro.dell.com/dellstore/! Plans changed one more time; back to the original plan, get it with Linux.
I obviously asked why it wasn’t listed on dell.es/ubuntu. The sales rep said that s/he didn’t know why and that s/he will forward my query to the relevant department. I bought the laptop with Ubuntu that day and that was it.
Today, out of curiosity, I went to dell.es/ubuntu and found that it hasn’t changed! The link the sales rep provided me with the other day still works but the laptop is not listed. And the same happens in dell.fr/ubuntu, dell.co.uk/ubuntu and dell.de/ubuntu, for example.
This can hardly be a mistake. Why the heck does Dell hide some of the few Linux-powered computers they sell now? Maybe due to threats from Microsoft? After all, it’s well-know for its monopolistic practices.
PS (April 18th @ 14:00 UTC): The link above to configure2.euro.dell.com/dellstore/ doesn’t work at times today, so here’s an screenshot if it doesn’t work for you:
PS (April 19th @ 18:30 UTC): This is an screenshot of the random error I warned about yesterday (which I took just in case), before reaching Digg.com’s front-page:
Now, almost 20 hours after reaching Digg’s front-page, the link no longer works (not even at times, as yesterday) and a better formatted page is displayed instead:
I don’t know if the different error pages actually mean something, but my point is that the link is now dead.
November 12th, 2008
I am absolutely convinced that freedomware requires less typical development projects and more engineering projects. To overtake freedom-trampling software, we need more than a good philosophy, the best hardware support, cutting-edge technology and money — we need engineering.
We have a lot to learn from the freedom-trampling industry is this regard (possibly, the only thing that is worth “porting” to the freedomware environment). In that industry, software process standards (like CMMi or ISO 12207) are widely used and often a requirement. And we need them here too:
- We have more people working together and commonly they are from different countries. Diversity is enormous. So, we need standard, comprehensive and proven mechanisms to handle the software process.
- Nearly all of the freedomware projects are mere software development projects, not software engineering projects (and that’s a huge difference!). The wide range of bad practices extends from lack of proper in-code documentation to unrealistic deadlines, including no way to keep track of users’ satisfaction (specially of those who don’t speak the lingua franca of technology). This is, free software is rarely measured (and that, using our own terminology, is a “blocker bug”).
That a given project is community-driven with no full or part-time developer is not an excuse not to measure the software they create. It’ll certainly take time to learn what and how to measure (depending on one’s responsibilities) if the person is new to software measurement, as well as time to analyze the relevant collected measures periodically, but rest assured that by basing your estimations and decisions on such an periodical analysis, the continuous improvement of the project would be guaranteed.
Of course, not every freedomware project “must” be a software engineering project. Tiny projects aimed at a very limited audience and maintained by a couple of developers may not require such a care, specially if it’s not expected to grow too much.
Unfortunately, it’s worth noting that there’s a drawback of using standards like the ones mentioned above: They (usually) assume a software development process like that of non-free software, so you’ll frequently encounter (much) text specific to such processes; and as a result, many processes specific to freedomware development are not covered. I think we need an standard that addresses our software development processes.
As in the previous article on software measurement, I recommend the book “Software Measurement” by Christof Ebert and Reiner Dumke (ISBN: 978-3-540-71648-8). As I said previously, it’s a must-read, although it’s perhaps specially aimed at decision-makers and not too much at developers themselves.
Another good book on this topic, which is more practical (as its title implies), is “Software measurement and estimation: A practical approach” by Linda Laird and M. Carol Brennan (ISBN: 978-0-471-67622-5). This one is definitely aimed at developers themselves.
If I reached my goal of making you interested in software measurement in freedomware, then you may also want to keep an eye on the upcoming ÉcoleCua project.
Finally, I invite you to check out Ohloh.net, a gratis and basic metrics service for freedomware projects.
November 10th, 2008
(Practice has changed my view on the subject since I wrote this ranty and simplistic post. By 2010, the most significant realization has been that there’s no such a thing as “Software Engineering”.)
Tired of the indeliberate usage of the term “software engineering”, where “software developer” and “software engineer” seem to be exchangeable, I’m writing this article to explain what I think Software Engineering really is.
But first, let’s remember some basic terminology:
- Anyone who can create a program in at least one programming language, regardless of the use of a systematic approach (if any).
- Software developer
- A software developer is a programmer who doesn’t only care about about simply writing code, but also cares about (although may not be directly involved in) the requirement analysis, the functional specification, the design, the testing, the deployment and the maintenance of the software product they work on. Disciplined software developers usually follow a software development methodology, like XP.
- According to the Wikipedia (bolds are mine): “Engineering is the discipline and profession of applying technical and scientific knowledge and utilizing natural laws and physical resources in order to design and implement materials, structures, machines, devices, systems, and processes that safely realize a desired objective and meet specified criteria.”
Both programmers and software developers qualify the software progress. They can’t often meet deadlines nor track process because they don’t know for sure where they are nor where they should be. Qualification is subjective and absolutely imprecise, so you can only have subjective and imprecise answers to precise questions like “when it’s going to be ready?” (to which the most common answers are “soon” or “when it’s ready” in the freedomare world).
When you travel by car, what can you do to find how far you’re from the destination and how much time is left? You have to measure. If you find a sign that states that you’re 20Kms away from your destination and you measure the current car’s speed (well, your car does so for you) and it turns out to be 60Km/hour, then you’ll realize that if you keep the speed you’ll arrive in 20 minutes. If you don’t measure, you can’t tell if you’re on time and you can’t even avoid getting late next time (to improve, you need to know the previous measures!).
If you quantify, you will find the real status of a given process and whether you’ll reach your goals within the desired parameters (time, money, etc.). If you quantified and analyzed such measures, you will be able to execute the right corrections in order to improve the process and thus reach the goals within the desired parameters, or at least reduce the difference between the desired parameters and the final results (this is, reduce risk). And that’s not specific to software.
So, the difference between a disciplined software developer and a software engineer, is that the former qualifies and the later quantifies. In a software engineering project, when a process is going wrong, it’s found (the sooner or later) thanks to software metrics (or “software measurements”) and the appropriate steps are taken to reduce risk. In a software development project, the process is not measured and software product is delivered out of at least one parameter (over-budget, with less features, after the deadline, etc.).
I don’t think you need a diploma that says you’re a software engineer (or hold a position ending by “Software Engineer” in a organization) to call yourself “software engineer”, unless required by local law. But you need to be a disciplined software developer who measures the software process and make decisions based on an objective analysis of the relevant measures.
There are good resources out there to learn more about software measurement. The one I strongly recommend is “Software Measurement” by Christof Ebert and Reiner Dumke (ISBN: 978-3-540-71648-8). This book is a great introduction to software measurement and covers the four kinds of software metrics (project, process, product and people metrics). I think it’s a must-read for anyone involved in software processes and wants to improve continuously (which can only be achieved by measuring!).
But there are also good resources on the Web, like the ones listed below. Unfortunately, I couldn’t find something like the book above, but online.
- Debates within software engineering, which also addresses the use of the term “engineering” in the software context.
- Software engineering.
- Software metric.
- The Goal/Question/Metric (GQM) Approach: Not everything is worth measuring!
- Software development process.
- Comparison of the occurrences for “programmer”, “software developer” and “software engineer” on the Web.
October 30th, 2008
My first impression with Intrepid has not been good at all:
- It broke the web server in one of the servers I administrate, and it took me a while to spot the bug.
- I had no way to access the Internet from my laptop! No wireless network, no wired network. Nothing. Picture how hard it was for me to get help on IRC using another computer. Not to mention the time I wasted trying to fix it, while I was downloading the CD for Hardy.
PS (Nov 4th): A few days later, I have to admit that I love this Kubuntu release! It fixed several broken things from Hardy and includes nice features!