<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally Satisfied With KDE 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gustavonarea.net/blog/posts/finally-satisfied-with-kde-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gustavonarea.net/blog/posts/finally-satisfied-with-kde-4/</link>
	<description>Just a social techie</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:54:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Wronka</title>
		<link>http://gustavonarea.net/blog/posts/finally-satisfied-with-kde-4/comment-page-1/#comment-21673</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Wronka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 16:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gustavonarea.net/?p=65#comment-21673</guid>
		<description>It somehow seems that I am the only person who actually likes KDE 4.0.
Yeah, I know it&#039;s got its problems, and surely more than just a fair share. But it is quite usable, although some things surely are still missing.
I am looking forward to get to play with KDE 4.1 when Fedora 10 comes out, but until then I&#039;ll be happy enough with 4.0, especially now that I finally got it running in 1280x1024 on my PC.

You may not remember KDE 1, but I can tell you that you&#039;ll gladly prefer to use KDE 4.0 over it. Not that KDE 1 has been unstable or plain crap, it&#039;s been good, but compared to later KDEs it just looked ugly, and just didn&#039;t offer yet all the comfort of a modern desktop environment.

Also many people seem to forget that KDE 4 is a big redesign of a really big project, and not &quot;just another update&quot;. It&#039;s a major step forward, and that has its cost.
Contrary to many people I also do not think that KDE 4 has been released prematurely. As said, I am aware of its problems, but if nobody gets to use it those problems just will be discovered a lot slower. Having it released to the general public of course will provoke some angry comments, but overall I think it only improves the system. And I am pretty sure that this is the exact reason why it KDE 4.0 has replaced KDE 3.5 in Fedora 9.

So, overall, KDE 4 is a big step forward, and it looks awesome. With the release of 4.1 a lot of problems surely will be gone, and finally most of the K-stuff (like KMail and others) is there, so people maybe can stop complaining now... ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It somehow seems that I am the only person who actually likes KDE 4.0.<br />
Yeah, I know it&#8217;s got its problems, and surely more than just a fair share. But it is quite usable, although some things surely are still missing.<br />
I am looking forward to get to play with KDE 4.1 when Fedora 10 comes out, but until then I&#8217;ll be happy enough with 4.0, especially now that I finally got it running in 1280&#215;1024 on my PC.</p>
<p>You may not remember KDE 1, but I can tell you that you&#8217;ll gladly prefer to use KDE 4.0 over it. Not that KDE 1 has been unstable or plain crap, it&#8217;s been good, but compared to later KDEs it just looked ugly, and just didn&#8217;t offer yet all the comfort of a modern desktop environment.</p>
<p>Also many people seem to forget that KDE 4 is a big redesign of a really big project, and not &#8220;just another update&#8221;. It&#8217;s a major step forward, and that has its cost.<br />
Contrary to many people I also do not think that KDE 4 has been released prematurely. As said, I am aware of its problems, but if nobody gets to use it those problems just will be discovered a lot slower. Having it released to the general public of course will provoke some angry comments, but overall I think it only improves the system. And I am pretty sure that this is the exact reason why it KDE 4.0 has replaced KDE 3.5 in Fedora 9.</p>
<p>So, overall, KDE 4 is a big step forward, and it looks awesome. With the release of 4.1 a lot of problems surely will be gone, and finally most of the K-stuff (like KMail and others) is there, so people maybe can stop complaining now&#8230; <img src='http://gustavonarea.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
